Sejak ada pelbagai pihak mencadangkan agar kerajaan menerima masuk Chin Peng, yang bising hanya bekas perajurit dan orang Melayu.
Orang Cina, samada dari dalam BN atau luar, diam saja...kenapa? Mereka boleh memaafkan Chin Peng?
Dalam pada itu kita melihat Nik Aziz mengumumkan dia sanggup mengubah undang-undang tubuh kerajaan negeri bagi membolehkan orang Cina menjadi Menteri Besar...apa agaknya reaksi yang sewajarnya bagi mereka yang cintakan negara dan agama?
Tuesday, December 29, 2009
Monday, December 28, 2009
Sebenarnya integriti dan kemampuan Anwar memimpin sekadar bergantung kepada keghairahan buta penyokong mempertahankan isu peribadinya. Selain itu, keupayaannya sebagai pemimpin tidak ke mana jika ditolak sokongan daripada parti-parti komponen Pakatan.
Ini terbukti dalam isu pelantikan semula Jeffrey Kitingan sebagai timbalan presiden PKR Sabah. Dalam isu ini Anwar jelas menonjolkan kelemahan prinsip apabila terpaksa tunduk kepada ketidakpuasaan hati akar umbi berhubung barisan kepimpinan parti negeri. Akur kepada kemahuan akar umbi dalam konteks ini menonjolkan kerapuhan prinsip kerana apa dirancang dalam percaturan sebelumnya ialah menurut agenda yang hanya tercetus daripada pilihan peribadi - bukan secara demokratik. Lantaran disebabkan inilah maka akar umbi memberontak.Ia bukan mencerminkan pegangan asas demokrasi yang sebenar.
Anwar begitu mudah berbuat demikian kerana dia jelas memandang rendah orang Sabah. Dia prejudis dan menganggap orang Sabah kuno dan bodoh belaka - mudah dimanipulasi.
Jika diperingkat ini Anwar menunjukkan sikap demikian, bayangkan jika PKR menguasai Sabah?
Tuesday, December 22, 2009
Dalam Pakatan sendiri ramai yang merungut mengenai Konvensyen Pakatan di Shah Alam baru-baru ini...apakah itu saja yang mampu diperkatakan?
Jelas Anwar dan pemimpin pembangkang ketandusan modal kini apabila sekadar meluahkan retorik demi retorik.
Baca di antara keluhan pendokong Pakatan di sini.
Di penjuru lain, blogger 'zorro unmasked' atau nama sebenar Bernard Khoo mengeluh kesal apabila berkata, "...Of course I was disappointed when I learnt that key factors we expected that would be brought up at this FIRST convention was not on the agenda..." Apa ayang dimaksudkan Bernard, "...semestinya aku kesal apabila mengetahui faktor-faktor utama yang kita jangka akan dibentangkan di konvensyen pertama itu tidak terdapat dalam agenda..."
Sunday, December 20, 2009
Dalam retoriknya berhubung persefahaman di antara komponen Pakatan pada konvensyen Pakatan di Shah Alam kelmarin, Anwar berkata hak Melayu tetap dipelihara, tetapi dia tidak mendefinasikan apa yang dimaksudkan dengan hak Melayu daripada perspektif Pakatan.
Yang dia utamakan ialah Bahasa Melayu...tetapi semua orang maklum Bahasa Melayu ialah bahasa kebangsaan dan bukannya boleh dianggap secara am kini sebagai elemen utama hak Melayu.
Penggunaan Bahasa Melayu menguntungkan bangsa lain tetapi masih meletakkan status Melayu ditakuk yang sama.
Thursday, December 17, 2009
Wednesday, December 16, 2009
Just ponder...when we hear or read about maid abuse (especially of Indonesian maids), kidnapping for huge ransoms, organised contraband smuggling, gang rivalries, smuggling and distribution of opium, hard drugs or designer pills , illegal betting , gambling , prostitution and 'ibu ayam' (pimping), pirated DVDs ,brutal slayings, hired gunmen, do we think of the Malays (whether as individuals or otherwise) ?
Add to the list the latest busting of a family involved in the despicable act of 'manufacturing' babies for sale in Banting, Selangor...
There are many types of corruption but the ones linked to brutality and violence are not normally associated with the Malay society . At worst, Malays resort to bomohs to seek revenge, something no one can be very certain if that is an effective way of acting out vengeance.
Henceforth, the blinkered racial bigots whose eyes are ONLY set on the Malays for any wrongdoings under the sun ought to be more objective. It is a fact that Chinatowns anywhere in the world are associated with the criminal, organised underworld.
What has the Chinese of this country done to get away from that image? Can we not shake off such dark cultural associations? No, we cant...it is very difficult when the majority still directly or indirectly condones such things, either by being apathetic or plain disregard.
Why can't we look inwards at our own society and community and start building a new and positive cultural image...crime is never part of any cultural makeup. It is merely a crude exploitation of a society's weaknesses, which the elders and wise omit to address.
Just imagine, with such thick criminal traits within certain spectrum of society, what will happen if they gain political power?
The ramifications can be intelligently predicted.
Saturday, December 12, 2009
Dalam rencananya yang tersiar dalam akhbar The Star kelmarin, wartawan Jocelyn Tan berkata Nazri Aziz seorang anak jantan dan pahlawan samurai terakhir. Begitu tinggi penghormatan media bukan Melayu diberikan kepada penderhaka bangsa itu.
Pada saya seseorang itu hanya boleh dianggap anak jantan jika dia berani berjuang mempertahankan yang lemah (dengan wajar) dan yang tertindas dengan penuh beradab. Tetapi lain pula cerita dengan si Nazri ini... apa yang ditonjolkan ialah kebodohan dan keberanian tak bertempat selain tidak bersopan terhadap pemimpin lebih tua, apatah lagi yang menaikkannya.
Terbaru dengar khabar Dato' Najib tidak akan 'mengapa-apakan' Nazri. Bagaimanapun, setakat yang saya difahamakan, Perdana Menteri 'mengarahkan' supaya Menteri di Jabatan Perdana Menteri itu jangan membaling lumpur dalam rumah sendiri. Selain itu PM juga dilaporkan berkata akan menyelesaikan isu BTN secara peribadi. beliau juga meminta semua menteri dalam kabinetnya berhenti berdebat tentang biro berkenaan.
Mungkin Dato' Najib sudah 'miss the point' di sini kerana isu tersebut dibangkitkan oleh pembangkang di Selangor. Ia berupa satu daripada agenda dalam beberapa siri serangan untuk menghakiskan kredibiliti dan memalukan pentadbiran Dato' Najib sendiri. Oleh yang demikian, apa yang sepatutnya dilakukan ialah memberi amaran kepada pembangkang berhubung hal ini.
Tuesday, December 8, 2009
Nazri Aziz dan keluarganya mempunyai pertalian waris yang erat di Lenggong.
Sejak bintangnya menyinar (terima kasih kepada Tun Mahathir) dan dia melonjakkan dirinya ke persada Dewan Negara dan seterusnya Dewan Rakyat, orang kampung di Lenggong yang begitu bangga dengan kejayaan anak watan tersebut pada satu ketika dulu itu (walaupun dia hidup bersenang di KL), rata-rata tidak menikmati sebarang pembangunan positif. Mungkin ada sedikit sebanyak keuntungan dan bantuan yang diberikan dalam pelbagai bentuk kepada saudara terdekat, beras pulut dan kain pelikat ketika menyambut raya. Itu saja.
Kini dia mewakili kerusi parlimen Padang Rengas, dan Lenggong seolah-olah berjuta tahun ditinggalkan. Padang Rengas hanya sekadar kubu untuk memantapkan 'dominionnya' ketika waktu-waktu orang kampung semakin mempersoalkan sumbangannya...lantaran diadakan projek gotong royong membantu seorang dua rakyat daif dan sebagainya...dan selepas itu senyaplah kembali kawasan disebalik bukit itu.
Selain persoalan yang begitu licik dicaturkan di Lenggong atau di Padang Rengas, dia kini tertonjol seperti bengkak membusung di kalangan rakan-rakan sejawatnya samada dalam UMNO, kerajaan ataupun di parlimen.
Ramai yang mempersoalkan pendiriannya sebenar. Ketidaktentuan prinsip sesuatu yang amat berbahaya kepada mana-mana parti dalam sesebuah demokrasi...takut nanti dengan satu ciuman daripada sang puteri, Nazri Aziz menjadi katak dan terus melompat...tapi kalau melompat sekarang pun tak ada yang akan berasa terlalu rugi kot...
Saturday, December 5, 2009
Anwar has accused Aussie premier Kevin Rudd of appeasing Malaysia’s ‘‘corrupt leaders’’ in the continuing fallout from the Prime Minister’s decision not to meet Anwar.
Anwar, who is in Melbourne to speak at the Parliament of World Religions, said Rudd was acting in the interests of diplomacy but the snub was unwise and ignored the importance of ethics and morality.
‘‘He was too obsessed with interests of getting the two countries together [and therefore] appease Malaysia’s corrupt leaders,’’ he said.
July last year, Rudd praised the country as a ‘‘vibrant’’ and ‘‘flourishing’’ democracy.
The Aussie PM adhered to usual protocols by not meeting with Anwar.
Wednesday, December 2, 2009
It was bad enough when he was so prone to spew idiotic statements that in most cases were nothing more than transparent attempts at coddling his colleagues in the Government. Most times his superficial remarks, which border on stupidity, like calling other honourable MPs ‘idiots’ only speak of his shallowness as a minister, not to say a lawyer to boot (pun intended!)
In the latest development, we suddenly see this self affirming character riding on the crest of plaudits from opposition stalwarts in parliament for helping to carry the battering ram against the National Civics Bureau (BTN), which happens to be an agency under the Prime Minister’s Department.
It is not so surprising to hear the Minister in charge of KPI Datuk Seri Idris Jala throwing the net over BTN based on blind reports from detractors and opposition supporters within the Government who disliked the way the courses were run, although in reality there was nothing wrong. The only concern was the polarisation of ideas within the context of the Prime Minister’s 1Malaysia concept.
Here, it is again a question of perception and understanding. Following Idris Jala’s take on BTN, which saw him suggesting a reorganisation of the bureau, Selangor’s Pakatan Government was swift to jump on the band wagon to grind it to the ground with further allegations that offered reasons to initiate a banning of the state’s civil servants and students from attending nation-building courses conducted by BTN.
Going back to Nazri, it was indeed a surprise for a member of the ruling party to go against the grain in parliament. It was either there was no prior discussion over the matter, or Nazri went out on a lone populist crusade to collect points from the opposition or for some other reasons.
Are we to believe the words and mindset of Nazri Aziz? I say not. Let us recall the embarrassment to the country over the lock-up detainee abuse scandal (also known as Squatgate) involving allegations of abuse of detainees (initially Chinese citizens) under the care of the police. After the Government despatched a minister to apologise the incident, it was discovered that the victim was not a Chinese national but a Malaysian woman.
The Parliamentary Human Rights Caucus, led by Nazri Aziz did not hesitate to condemn the action without prior investigation. For some reasons, Nazri was quick to come to the defence of what he mistakenly took for a Chinese damsel in distress in Malaysia. He was grossly wrong! So much for credibility.
And now, we hear of Nazri insisting that the BTN was, indeed, provoking racists sentiments in its courses. Despite testimonies from other ministers of the agency’s propriety, Nazri insisted that it was not the case. Subsequently, he went on to announce that BTN would be revamped, attributing it to a decision taken by the cabinet earlier. And when Minister in-charge of BTN, Datuk Ahmad Maslan corrected that it would only be an upgrade of course contents, Nazri fired back saying it was a revamp no less. Why such a strident stance when besides unfounded remarks based on the allegations by skewed interpretations of the courses by a disgruntled few, there was not a thread of hard evidence that points to impropriety.
Therefore, only an irrational mind would want to accept and believe a character such as Datuk Seri Nazri Aziz.
Tuesday, December 1, 2009
The High Court has inherent powers to set aside the charge against Anwar but ruled that he must prove his claims of bad intent and political conspiracy on the part of the A-G's office.
Judge Datuk Mohamad Zabidin Mohd Diah dismissed PKR adviser's bid to strike out the sodomy charge
Zabidin added that it was up to the prosecution to decide how they wanted to prove penetration occurred.
Anwar, a 62-year-old grandfather stands accused of sodomy for the second time in his life; this time, it is with a former male aide, Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan, 24.Trial has been fixed the trial to be from January 25 to February 25 next year.
Sunday, November 29, 2009
Obsessed with BTN's so-called rascist stance? Get to know America's Tavistock Institute...you'll be shocked!
TAVISTOCK - THE BEST KEPT SECRET IN AMERICA
30 Tabernacle Street, London EC2A 4DD.--
Formed in 1947, the Tavistock Institute is an independent not-for-profit organization which seeks to combine research in the social sciences with professional practice. Problems of institution-building and organizational design and change are being tackled in all sectors - government, industry and commerce, health and welfare, education, etc. - nationally and internationally, and clients range from multinationals to small community groups. A growth area has been the use of a developmental approach to evaluation of new and experimental programs, particularly in health, education and community development. This has also produced new training events alongside the regular program of group relations conferences. The Institute owns and edits the monthly journal Human Relations (published by Plenum Press) which is now in its 48th year, and has recently launched (in conjunction with Sage Publications) a new journal Evaluation.
Three elements combine to make the Institute unusual, if not unique: it has the independence of being entirely self-financing, with no subsidies from the government or other sources; the action research orientation places it between, but not in, the worlds of academia and consultancy; and its range of disciplines include anthropology, economics, organizational behavior, political science, psychoanalysis, psychology and sociology.
The ideology of American foundations was created by the Tavistock Institute of Human Relations in London. In 1921, the Duke of Bedford, Marquess of Tavistock, the 11th Duke, gave a building to the Institute to study the effect of shellshock on British soldiers who survived World War I. Its purpose was to establish the "breaking point" of men under stress, under the direction of the British Army Bureau of Psychological Warfare, commanded by Sir John Rawlings-Reese.
Tavistock Institute is headquartered in London. Its prophet, Sigmond Freud, settled in Maresfield Gardens when he moved to England. He was given a mansion by Princess Bonaparte. Tavistock's pioneer work in behavioral science along Freudian lines of "controlling" humans established it as the world center of foundation ideology. Its network now extends from the University of Sussex to the U.S. through the Stanford Research Institute, Esalen, MIT, <http://watch.pair.com/Hudson.html>Hudson Institute, <http://watch.pair.com/heritage.html>Heritage Foundation, Center of Strategic and International Studies at Georgetown, where State Dept. personal are trained, US Air Force Intelligence, and the Rand and Mitre corporations. The personnel of the corporations are required to undergo indoctrination at one or more of these Tavistock controlled institutions. A network of secret groups, the Mont Pelerin Society, Trilateral Commission, Ditchley Foundation, and the Club of Rome is conduit for instructions to the Tavistock network.
Tavistock Institute developed the mass brain-washing techniques which were first used experimentally on American prisoners of war in Korea. Its experiments in crowd control methods have been widely used on the American public, a surreptitious but nevertheless outrageous assault on human freedom by modifying individual behavior through topical psychology. A German refugee, Kurt Lewin, became director of Tavistock in 1932. He came to the U.S. in 1933 as a "refugee", the first of many infiltrators, and set up the Harvard Psychology Clinic, which originated the propaganda campaign to turn the American public against Germany and involve us in World War II.
In 1938, Roosevelt executed a secret agreement with Churchill which in effect ceded U.S. sovereignty to England, because it agreed to let Special Operations Executive control U.S. policies. To implement this agreement, Roosevelt sent General Donovan to London for indoctrination before setting up OSS (now the CIA) under the aegis of SOE-SIS. The entire OSS program, as well as the CIA has always worked on guidelines set up by the Tavistock Institute.
Tavistock Institute originated the mass civilian bombing raids carried out by Roosevelt and Churchill purely as a clinical experiment in mass terror, keeping records of the results as they watched the "guinea pigs" reacting under "controlled laboratory conditions". All Tavistock and American foundation techniques have a single goal---to break down the psychological strength of the individual and render him helpless to oppose the dictators of the World Order. Any technique which helps to break down the family unit, and family inculcated principles of religion, honor, patriotism and sexual behavior, is used by the Tavistock scientists as weapons of crowd control.
The methods of Freudian psychotherapy induce permanent mental illness in those who undergo this treatment by destabilizing their character. The victim is then advised to "establish new rituals of personal interaction", that is, to indulge in brief sexual encounters which actually set the participants adrift with no stable personal relationships in their lives, destroying their ability to establish or maintain a family. Tavistock Institute has developed such power in the U.S. that no one achieves prominence in any field unless he has been trained in behavioral science at Tavistock or one of its subsidiaries.
Henry Kissinger, whose meteoric rise to power is otherwise inexplicable, was a German refugee and student of Sir John Rawlings-Reese at SHAEF. Dr. Peter Bourne, a Tavistock Institute psychologist, picked Jimmy Carter for President of the U.S. solely because Carter had undergone an intensive brainwashing program administered by Admiral Hyman Rickover at Annapolis. The "experiment" in compulsory racial integration in the U.S. was organized by Ronald Lippert, of the OSS and the American Jewish Congress, and director of child training at the Commission on Community Relations. The program was designed to break down the individual's sense of personal knowledge in his identity, his racial heritage. Through the Stanford Research Institute, Tavistock controls the National Education Association. The Institute of Social Research at the National Training Lab brain washes the leading executives of business and government.
Such is the power of Tavistock that our entire space program was scrapped for nine years so that the Soviets could catch up. The hiatus was demanded in an article written by Dr. Anatol Rapport, and was promptly granted by the government, to the complete mystification of everyone connected with NASA. Another prominent Tavistock operation is the Wharton School of Finance, at the University of Pennsylvania. A single common denominator identifies the common Tavistock strategy---the use of drugs. The infamous MK Ultra program of the CIA, in which unsuspecting CIA officials were given LSD, and their reaction studied like "guinea pigs", resulted in several deaths.
The U.S. Government had to pay millions in damages to the families of the victims, but the culprits were never indicted. The program originated when Sandoz AG, a Swiss drug firm, owned by S.G. Warburg Co. of London, developed Lysergic Acid [LSD]. Roosevelt's advisor, James Paul Warburg, son of Paul Warburg who wrote the Federal Reserve Act, and nephew of Max Warburg who had financed Hitler, set up the <http://watch.pair.com/FreedomHouse.html#ips>Institute for Policy Studies to promote the drug. The result was the LSD "counter-culture" of the 1960s, the "student revolution", which was financed by $25 million from the CIA.
One part of MK Ultra was the Human Ecology Fund; the CIA also paid Dr. Herbert Kelman of Harvard to carry out further experiments on mind control. In the 1950s, the CIA financed extensive LSD experiments in Canada. Dr. D. Ewen Cameron, president of the Canadian Psychological Association, and director of Royal Victorian Hospital, Montreal, received large payments from the CIA to give 53 patients large doses of LSD and record their reactions; the patients were drugged into weeks of sleep and then given electric shock treatments.
One victim, the wife of a member of the Canadian Parliament, is now suing the U.S. companies who provided the drug for the CIA. All the records of the CIA's drug testing program were ordered destroyed by the head of MK Ultra. Because all efforts of the Tavistock Institute are directed toward producing cyclical collapse, the effect of the CIA programs are tragically apparent. R. Emmett Tyrell Jr., writing in the Washington Post August 20, 1984, cites the "squalid consequences of the 60s radicals in SDS" as resulting in "the growing rate of illegitimacy, petty lawlessness, drug addiction, welfare, VD, and mental illness".
This is the legacy of the Warburgs and the CIA. Their principal agency, the Institute for Policy Studies, was funded by James Paul Warburg; its co-founder was Marcus Raskin, protege of McGeorge Bundy, president of the Ford Foundation. Bundy had Raskin appointed to the post of President Kennedy's personal representative on the National Security Council, and in 1963 funded Students for Democratic Society, through which the CIA operated the drug culture.
Today the Tavistock Institute operates a $6 Billion a year network of Foundations in the U.S., all of it funded by U.S. taxpayers' money. Ten major institutions are under its direct control, with 400 subsidiaries, and 3000 other study groups and think tanks which originate many types of programs to increase the control of the World Order over the American people. The Stanford Research Institute, adjoining the Hoover Institution, is a $150 million a year operation with 3300 employees. It carries on program surveillance for Bechtel, Kaiser, and 400 other companies, and extensive intelligence operations for the CIA. It is the largest institution on the West Coast promoting mind control and the behavioral sciences.
One of the key agencies as a conduit for secret instructions from Tavistock is the Ditchley Foundation, founded in 1957. The American branch of the Ditchley Foundation is run by Cyrus Vance, former Secretary of State, and director of the Rockefeller Foundation, and Winston Lord, president of the Council on Foreign Relations.
One of the principal but little known operations of the Rockefeller Foundation has been its techniques for controlling world agriculture. Its director, Kenneth Wernimont, set up Rockefeller controlled agricultural programs throughout Mexico and Latin America. The independent farmer is a great threat to the World Order, because he produces for himself, and because his produce can be converted into capital, which gives him independence. In Soviet Russia, the Bolsheviks believed they had attained total control over the people; they were dismayed to find their plans threatened by the stubborn independence of the small farmers, the Kulaks.
Stalin ordered the OGPU to seize all food and animals of the Kulaks, and to starve them out. The Chicago American, February 25, 1935 carried a front page headline, SIX MILLION PERISH IN SOVIET FAMINE; Peasants' Crops Seized, They and their Animals Starve. To draw attention from this atrocity, it was later alleged that the Germans, not the Soviets, had killed six million people, the number taken from the Chicago American headline by a Chicago publicist.
The Communist Party, the Party of the Peasants and Workers, exterminated the peasants and enslaved the workers. Many totalitarian regimes have found the small farmer to be their biggest stumbling block. The French Reign of Terror was directed, not against the aristocrats, many of whom were sympathetic to it, but against the small farmers who refused to turn over their grain to the revolutionary tribunals in exchange for the worthless assignats. In the United States, the foundations are presently engaged in the same type of war of extermination against the American farmer.
The traditional formula of land plus labor for the farmer has been altered due to the farmer's need for purchasing power, to buy industrial goods needed in his farming operations. Because of this need for capital, the farmer is especially vulnerable to the World Order's manipulation of interest rates, which is bankrupting him. Just as in the Soviet Union, in the early 1930s, when Stalin ordered the Kulaks to give up their small plots of land to live and work on the collective farms, the American small farmer faces the same type of extermination, being forced to give up his small plot of land to become a hired hand for the big agricultural trusts. The Brookings Institution and other foundations originated the monetary programs implemented by the Federal Reserve System to destroy the American farmer, a replay of the Soviet tragedy in Russia, with one proviso that the farmer will be allowed to survive if he becomes a slave worker of the giant trusts.
Once the citizen becomes aware of the true role of the foundations, he can understand the high interest rates, high taxes, the destruction of the family, the degradation of the churches into forums for revolution, the subversion of the universities into CIA cesspools of drug addiction, and the halls of government into sewers of international espionage and intrigue. The American citizen can now understand why every agent of the federal government is against him; the alphabet agencies, the FBI, IRS, CIA and BATF must make war on the citizen in order to carry out the programs of the foundations.
The foundations are in direct violation of their charters, which commit them to do "charitable" work, because they make no grants which are not part of a political goal. The charge has been made, and never denied, that the Heritage-AEI network has at least two KGB moles on its staff. The employment of professional intelligence operatives as "charitable" workers, as was done in the Red Cross Mission to Russia in 1917, exposes the sinister political economic and social goals which the World Order requires the foundations to achieve through their " bequests ".
Not only is this tax fraud, because the foundations are granted tax exemption solely to do charitable work, but it is criminal syndicalism, conspiracy to commit offenses against the United States of America, Constitutional Law 213, Corpus Juris Secundum 16. For the first time, the close interlocking of the foundation "syndicate" has been revealed by the names of its principle incorporators---Daniel Coit Gilman, who incorporated the Peabody Fund and the John Slater Fund, and became an incorporator of the General Education Board (now the Rockefeller Foundation); Gilman, who also incorporated the Russell Trust in 1856, later became an incorporator of the Carnegie Institution with Andrew Dickson White (Russell Trust) and Frederic A. Delano. Delano also was an original incorporator of the Brookings Institution and the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
Daniel Coit Gilman incorporated the Russell Sage Foundation with Cleveland H. Dodge of the National City Bank. These foundations incorporators have been closely linked with the Federal Reserve System, the War Industries Board of World War I, the OSS of World War II and the CIA. They have also been closely linked with the American International Corporation, which was formed to instigate the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia. Delano, an uncle of Franklin Delano Roosevelt, was on the original Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System in 1914. His brother-in-law founded the influential Washington law firm of Covington and Burling. The Delanos and other ruling families of the World Order trace their lineage directly back to William of Orange and the regime which granted the charter of the Bank of England.
Tavistock Institutions In The United States
Flow Laboratories Gets contracts from the National Institutes of Health.
Merle Thomas Corporation Gets contracts from the U.S. Navy, analyzes data from satellites.
Walden Research Does work in the field of pollution control.
Planning Research Corporation, Arthur D. Little, G.E. "TEMPO", Operations Research Inc. Part of approximately 350 firms who conduct research and conduct surveys, make recommendations to government. They are part of what President Eisenhower called "a possible danger to public policy that could itself become captive of a scientific-technological elite."
Brookings Institution Dedicates its work to what it calls a "national agenda." Wrote President Hoover's program, President Roosevelt's "New Deal", the Kennedy Administration's "New Frontiers" program (deviation from it may have cost John F. Kennedy his life), and President Johnson's "Great Society." Brookings has been telling the United States Government how to conduct its affairs for the past 70 years and is still doing so.
Hudson Institute This institution has done more to shape the way Americans react to political and social events, think, vote and generally conduct themselves than perhaps any except the BIG FIVE. Hudson specializes in defense policy research and relations with the USSR. Most of its military work is classified as SECRET. (One idea during the Vietnam War was to build a moat around Saigon.) Hudson may be properly classified as one of the Committee of 300's BRAINWASHING establishments. One of its largest clients is the U.S. Department of Defense which includes matters of civil defense, national security, military policy and arms control.
National Training Laboratories One of the key institutions established for this purpose in the United States was the National Training Laboratories (NTL). Founded in 1947 by members of the Tavistock network in the United States and located originally on an estate in Bethel, Maine, NTL had as its explicit purpose the brainwashing of leaders of the government, educational institutions, and corporate bureaucracies in the Tavistock method, and then using these "leaders" to either themselves run Tavistock group sessions in their organizations or to hire other similarly trained group leaders to do the job. The "nuts and bolts" of the NTL operation revolves around the particular form of Tavistock degenerate psychology known as "group dynamics," developed by German Tavistock operative Kurt Lewin, who emigrated to the United States in the 1930s and whose students founded NTL.
In a Lewinite brainwashing group, a number of individuals from varying backgrounds and personalities, are manipulated by a "group leader" to form a "consensus" of opinion, achieving a new "group identity." The key to the process is the creation of a controlled environment, in which stress is introduced (sometimes called dissonance) to crack an individual's belief structure. Using the peer pressure of other group members, the individual is "cracked," and a new personality emerges with new values. The degrading experience causes the person to deny that any change has taken place. In that way, an individual is brainwashed without the victim knowing what has taken place.
This method is the same, with some minor modification, used in all so-called "sensitivity groups" or "T-groups," or in the more extreme rock-drug-sex counterculture form, "touchy-feely groups," such as the kind popularized from the 1960s onward by the Esalen Institute, which was set up with the help of NTL.
From the mid-1950s onward, NTL put the majority of the nation's corporate leaderships through such brainwashing programs, while running similar programs for the State Department, the Navy, the Department of Education, and other sections of the federal bureaucracy. There is no firm estimate of the number of Americans who have been put through this process in last 40 years at either NTL, or as it is now known the NTL Institute for Applied Behavioral Sciences, which is based in Rosslyn, Virginia, or its West Coast base of operations, the Western Training Laboratories in Group Development, or in various satellite institutions. The most reliable estimate is in the several millions.
One of the groups that went through the NTL mill in the 1950s was the leadership of the National Education Association, the largest organization of teachers in the United States. Thus, the NEA's outlook has been "shaped" by Tavistock, through the NTL. In 1964, the NTL Institute became a direct part of the NEA, with the NTL setting up "group sessions" for all its affiliates. With funding from the Department of Education, the NTL Institute drafted the programs for the training of the nation's primary and secondary school teachers, and has a hand as well in developing the content of educational "reforms," including OBE.
Also known as the International Institute for Applied Behavioral Sciences. This institute is a brainwashing center in artificial stress training whereby participants suddenly find themselves immersed in defending themselves against vicious accusations. NTL takes in the National Education Association, the largest teacher group in the United States. While officially decrying "racism", it is interesting to note that NTL, working with NEA, produced a paper proposing education vouchers which would separate the hard-to-teach children from the brighter ones, and funding would be allocated according to the number of difficult children who would be separated from those who progressed at a normal rate. The proposal was not taken up.
University of Pennsylvania, Wharton School of Finance & Commerce Founded by Eric Trist One of the "brain trusts" of Tavistock, Wharton has become one of the more important Tavistock in so far as "Behavioral Research" is concerned. Wharton attracts clients such as the U.S. Department of Labor---which teaches how to produce "cooked" statistics at the Wharton Econometric Forecasting Associates Incorporated. This method was very much in demand as we came to the close of 1991 with millions more out of work than was reflected in USDL statistics. Wharton's ECONOMETRIC MODELING is used by every major Committee of 300 company in the United States, Western Europe, the International Monetary Fund, the United Nations, and the World Bank. Institute for Social Research Among its clients are The Ford Foundation, U.S.Department of Defense, U.S.Postal Service and the U.S. Department of Justice. Among its studies are "The Human Meaning Of Social Change", "Youth in Transition" and "How Americans View Their Mental Health".
Institute For The Future This is not a typical Tavistock institution in that it is funded by the Ford Foundation, yet it draws its long-range forecasting from the mother of all think tanks. Institute for the Future projects what it believes to be changes that will be taking place in time frames of fifty years. So called "DELPHI PANELS" decide what is normal and what is not, and prepare position papers to "steer" government in the right direction to head off such groups as "people creating civil disorder." (This could be patriotic groups demanding abolition of graduated taxes, or demanding that their right to bear arms is not infringed.) This institute recommends action such as liberalizing abortion laws, drug usage and that cars entering an urban area pay tolls, teaching birth control in public schools, requiring registration of firearms, making use of drugs a non-criminal offense, legalizing homosexuality, paying students for scholastic achievements, making zoning controls a preserve of the state, offering bonuses for family planning and last, but most frightening, a Pol Pot Cambodia-style proposal that new communities be established in rural areas, (concentration camp compounds). As can be observed, many of their goals have already been more than fully realized.
INSTITUTE FOR POLICY STUDIES (IPS)
One of the "Big Three", IPS has shaped and reshaped United States policies, foreign and domestic, since it was founded by James P. Warburg and the Rothschild entities in the United States. Its networks in America include the League for Industrial Democracy. Lead players in the League for Industrial Democracy have included Jeane Kirkpatrick, former U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations, Irwin Suall of the ADL, Eugene Rostow, Arms control negotiator, Lane Kirkland, Labor Leader, and Albert Shanker. IPS was incorporated in 1963 by Marcus Raskin and Richard Barnett, both highly trained Tavistock Institute graduates. The objectives of IPS came from an agenda laid down for it by the Tavistock Institute, one of the most notable being to create the "New Left" as a grass roots movement in the U.S. Its been said that Barnett and Raskin controlled such diverse elements as the Black Panthers, Daniel Ellsberg, National Security Council staff member Halprin, The Weathermen Underground, the Venceramos and the campaign staff of candidate George McGovern. No scheme was too big for IFS and its controllers to take on and manage.
Through its many powerful lobbing groups on Capitol Hill, IPS relentlessly used its "Big Stick" to beat Congress. IPS has a network of lobbyists, all supposedly operating independently but in actual fact acting cohesively, so that Congressmen are pummeled from all sides by seemingly different and varied lobbyists, In this way, IPS was, and is still, able to successfully sway individual Representatives and Senators to vote for "the trend, the way things are going." By using key pointmen on Capitol Hill, IPS was able to break into the very infrastructure of our legislative system and the way it works.
IPS became, and remains to this day, one of the most prestigious "think tanks" controlling foreign policy decisions, which we, the people, foolishly believe are those of our law makers. By sponsoring militant activism at home and with links to revolutionaries abroad, by engineering such victories as "The Pentagon Papers," besieging the corporate structure, bridging the credibility gap between underground movements and acceptable political activism, by penetrating religious organizations and using them to sow discord in America, such as radical racial policies under the guise of religion, using establishment media to spread IPS ideas, and then supporting them, IPS has lived up to the role which it was founded to play.
STANFORD RESEARCH INSTITUTE
Jesse Hobson, the first president of Stanford Research Institute, in a 1952 speech made it clear what lines the institute was to follow. Stanford can be described as one of the "jewels" in Tavistock's Crown in its rule over the United States. Founded in 1946 immediately after the close of WWII, it was presided over by Charles A. Anderson, with emphasis on mind control research and "future sciences." Included under the Stanford umbrella was Charles F. Kettering Foundation which developed the "Changing Images of Man" upon which the Aquarian Conspiracy rests.
Some of Stanford's major clients and contracts were at first centered around the defense establishment but, as Stanford grew, so, did the diversity of its services:
Applications of Behavioral Sciences to Research Management Office of Science and Technology
SRI Business Intelligence Program
U.S. Department of Defense Directorate of Defense Research and Engineering
U.S. Department of Defense Office of Aerospace Research
Among corporations seeking Stanford's services were Wells Fargo Bank, Bechtel Corporation, Hewlett Packard, Bank of America, McDonnell Douglas Corporation, Blyth, Eastman Dillon and TRW Company. One of Stanford's more secret projects was extensive work on chemical and bacteriological warfare (CAB) weapons.
Stanford Research is plugged into at least 200 smaller "think tanks" doing research into every facet of life in America. This is ARPA networking and represents the emergence of probably the most far reaching effort to control the environment of every individual in the country. At present Stanford's computers are linked with 2500 "sister" research consoles which include the CIA, Bell Telephone Laboratories, U.S. Army Intelligence, The Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI), Rand, MIT, Harvard and UCLA. Stanford plays a key role in that it is the "library", cataloging all ARPA documentation.
"Other agencies".....one can use one's imagination here, are allowed to search through SRI's "library" for key words, phrases, look through sources and update their own master files with those of Stanford Research Center. The Pentagon uses SRI's master files extensively, and there is little doubt that other U.S. Government agencies do the same. Pentagon "command and control" problems are worked out by Stanford.
While ostensibly these apply only to weapons and soldiers, there is absolutely no guarantee that the same research could not , and will not be turned to civilian applications. Stanford is known to be willing to do anything for anyone.
MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY (MIT),
ALFRED P. SLOAN SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT
This major institute is not generally recognized as being a part of Tavistock U.S.A. Most people look upon it as being a purely American institution, but that is far from the truth. MIT- Alfred Sloan can be roughly divided into the following groups:
Contemporary Technology Industrial Relations NASA-ERC Computer Research Laboratories Office of Naval Research Group, Psychology Systems Dynamics
Some of MIT's clients are:
American Management Association
Committee for Economic Development
Institute for Defense Analysis (IDA)
National Academy of Sciences
National Council of Churches
U.S. Department of State
RAND RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
Without a doubt, RAND is THE think tank most beholden to Tavistock Institute and certainly the RIIA's most prestigious vehicle for control of United States policies at every level. Specific RAND policies that became operative include our ICBM program, prime analyses for U.S. foreign policy making, instigator of space programs, U.S. nuclear policies, corporate analyses, hundreds of projects for the military, the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) in relation to the use of mind altering drugs like peyote, LSD (the covert MK-ULTRA operation which lasted for 20 years).
Some of RAND's clients include:
American Telephone and Telegraph Company (AT&T)
Chase Manhattan Bank
International Business Machines (IBM)
National Science Foundation
U.S. Air Force
U.S. Department of Health
U.S. Department of Energy
There are literally THOUSANDS of highly important companies, government institutions and organizations that make use of RANDS's services. To list them all would be impossible. Among RAND's specialities is a study group that predicts the timing and the direction of a thermonuclear war, plus working out the many scenarios based upon its findings. RAND was once accused of being commissioned by the USSR to work out terms of surrender of the United States Government, an accusation that went all the way to the United States Senate, where it was taken up by Senator Symington and subsequently fell victim to scorn poured out by the establishment press. BRAINWASHING remains the primary function of RAND.
These institutions are among those that fund The UNIFORM LAW FOUNDATION, whose function is to ensure that the Uniform Commercial Code remains the instrument for conducting business in the United States.
DAP wants BTN syllabus to be decided by the public.What kind of request is that? They know that BTN can produce its
syllabus to prove the allegations wrong, but failing to pin the bureau down at that, they now demand the contents be approved and chosen by public, i.e. themselves.
They may think the public has forgotten but in 1969 DAP was the main racial instigator. One has to be naive and blind not to see that DAP is a very thinly diguised racial movement.
If indeed BTN courses have been inciting racial hatred, by now millions of people would have died from racial violence in Malaysia, tragedies like those that took place in the Congo, Nigeria, even in the southern borders of the USA. We dont have that in Malaysia.But perhaps when and if the likes of DAP come into power the country could become like that? Just because the non-Malays in the main prefer to work for themselves rather than join the public sector or the uniformed organisations, they pick on such bodies...why blame others?
Thursday, November 26, 2009
Its all too much like a planned and concerted strategy on the part of Pakatan.
First we hear about their young reps running down the National Civics Bureau over allegations that it was being partisan. Yesterday we hear about Selangor Pakatan Rakyat Elected Representatives Officers Association (Selproa) secretary Ng Yap Hwa chasing out Utusan Malaysia journalist Yazid Alias, claiming that the daily was a “federal government agent.”
This is not good. I'd expect more tolerance (or acceptance) from Pakatan side. Many a times we've heard Pakatan alleging the federal government muzzling the press or what not, but now seems that the tables are being turned around....the pot calling the kettle black.
Stopping the press corps from doing their duty is definitely not cricket...or even democracy!
Sunday, November 22, 2009
Bekas pemimpin tertinggi Parti Komunis Malaya, Chin Peng akhirnya memohon maaf kepada semua mangsa dan keluarga mereka yang menjadi sasaran kumpulan pengganasnya semasa Darurat.
Ia membuktikan selama ini sememangnya dia menyedari perkara tersebut tetapi sengaja mengaburi mata
penyokongnya di zaman ini yang kebanyakan terdiri daripada generasi muda yang tidak merasakan langsung keperitan semasa zaman Darurat, sebaliknya mengagungkan Chin Peng setelah persona pemimpin pengganas komunis itu di 'spin' dan dicorakkan semula oleh pembangkang sebagai 'wira' negara.
Kini keadaan sebenar terserlah sudah. Apa lagi dalih Anwar dan mereka yang lantang mahukan Chin Peng dibenarkan kembali ke Malaysia?
Alasan Chin Peng kononnya apa yang berlaku adalah peperangan dan dalam keadaan sebegitu pasti ada mangsa tak berdosa yang terkorban tidak boleh diterima sama sekali kerana Darurat yang diisytiharkan bukan perang rasmi, lantaran segala keganasan yang berlaku berada di luar Konvensyen Geneva seperti dipersetujui dan diiktiraf semua negara merdeka di dunia. Justeru, PKM bukan parti yang sah semasa Darurat meletus, apatah lagi sebuah pasukan tentera yang berperang untuk sebuah negara.
Oleh itu segala apa yang didakwa oleh Chin Peng tidak langsung boleh diterima.
Friday, November 20, 2009
Antara beberapa komen sinis dan terang-terangan menghina umat Islam yang tersiar dalam Malaysia-Today saya paparkan diatas.
Apa yang boleh kita lakukan untuk mengelak perkara ini daripada merebak hingga tidak lagi mampu dikawal? Sekiranya ia berlaku di luar jurisdiksi Malaysia dalam konteks Internet, sememangnya kita masih berhak dan mempunyai 'locus standi' untuk bertindak. Mereka berselindung di sebalik pelbagai alasan termasuk kononnya isu jurisdiksi tidak boleh digunakan di sini kerana bentuk alam siber tanpa sempadan selain penempatan fizikal 'server' di luar Malaysia.
Bagaimanapun, hakikatnya jika kandungan sesuatu penerbitan maya berfokas kepada Malaysia dan orang Melayu, menggugat sentimen serta kenteraman awam di negara ini, apa kaedahnya? Lantaran itu kita wajib dan sah melakukan sesuatu.
Terjemahan 'screen capture' komen di atas:
"Beberapa tahun lalu, National geographic menyiarkan sebuah dokumentari yang mempersoalkan kaitan di antara Nabi Isa dan agama Kristian. Saya ingin mengajukan pertanyaan serupa. Apakah Islam sebenarnya diperturunkan oleh Tuhan? mengapa agama tersebut perlu dilindungi oleh manusia? Biasanya, manusia meminta perlindungan daripada Tuhan.
Apakah Mahkamah Syariah Pahang tidak memalukan Islam apabila mengenakan saman dan sebatan ke atas seorang wanita yang meminum arak? Dari mana mereka mendapat hukuman ini? Kenapa penjaga tunggal Muslim, yang kebanyakannya wanita tidak boleh mendapatkan keadilan daripada Mahkamah Syariah apabila bersabit kes anak-anak disisih oleh siayah? Kenapa isteri-isteri Muslim di kawasan luar bandar semakin ramai yang mati akibat AIDS akibat dijangkiti daripada siayah kerana tidak mengamalkan seks selamat atau kerana menjadi penagih dadah? Apakah ini sebabnya beberapa negeri mengenakan ujian AIDS ke atas pasangan Muslim lelaki sebelum dibenarkan berkahwin?"
Wednesday, November 18, 2009
Dalam perundangan, ada cara membuktikan ataupun setidak-tidaknya melukiskan keraguan ke atas kesahihan tertuduh atau saksi melalui apa yang ditanggap sebagai 'circumstantial evidence' atau 'character evidence.'
Apa yang dilaku dan disorokkan oleh Khalid Ibrahim berhubung hutang Talam Corp sebanyak RM391 juta juga boleh dibalikkan kepada dirinya jika digunakan kaedah-kaedah perundangaan dan prosedur seumpama itu. Ia boleh diwujud dan dipersoalkan oleh peguambela atau pihak pendakwa yang cekap dan pintar.
Ia boleh membawa kepada keraguan terhadapa perangai Menteri Besar Selangor itu sebagai berhelah dan mempunyai niat tidak baik.
Jika dia pernah memanipulasi keadaan, fakta, dan menggunakan undang-undang sebagai ahli korporat yang licik, apa akan menahannya daripada melakukan perkara yang sama kepada negeri Selangor?
Jangan diambil ringan keraguan dan kemarahan Setiausaha Agung PKR Datuk Salehuddin Hashim berhubung 'round tripping' jumlah tersebut. Salehuddin bukan kecik anak sebagai seorang ahli korporat amat berpengalaman dalam soal itu.
Monday, November 16, 2009
Bai'ah suatu lagi bukti sah PAS memperalatkan Islam untuk politik. Waspadalah...menyokong PAS boleh membawa kepada seseorang itu terpesong dalam perjuangan salah.
Intipati perjuangan PAS jelas tidak mantap walaupun pemimpinnya cukup hebat. Apa tidaknya, hingga perlu melakukan bai'ah hanya untuk menjadi calon pilihanraya. Apakah Khalid Samad begitu kemaruk mahukan jawatan dalam politik hingga sanggup mempertaruhkan keluarga?
Dia mendakwa pengertian bai'ah telah dipesongkan oleh UMNO, tetapi hakikatnya bukankah subjek pertaruhannya itu anak dan isteri? Kenapa tidak melakukan bai'ah murtad jika menjadi 'katak?'Setidak-tidaknya yang akan terbukti munafik hanyalah dia seorang saja!
Apa yang jelas, perlakuan bai'ah membuktikan kepimpinan PAS tidak mempunyai kepercayaan terhadap orangnya sendiri.
Orang PAS, tepuk dada dan tanya selera...apakah ini sudah lari daripada peradaban perjuangan Islam?
Sunday, November 15, 2009
With indications pointing to Nik Aziz being appointed Chairman of PRM, people can see how the disparate
ideologies are being stubbornly and unrealistically glued to a common platform, i.e.to displace BN come next election...at all cost!
What still holds sway is the spectre of post marriage blues within the pact, which in all reality spells nothing but trouble to the nation.
No one can deny that it is a time bomb waiting to go off.
Only an incorrigible and stubborn fool will wager his life as a Malaysian in the hands of these unlikely partners...
Friday, November 13, 2009
Zaid Ibrahim mencadangkan Nik Aziz dilantik menjadi Pengerusi Pakatan Rakyat sementara Tengku Razaleigh bersedia menjadi Perdana Menteri di bawah kerajaan Pakatan.
Ini dilihat ideal bagi mereka, tetapi pemerhati dalam Pakatan berasa sangsi. Tak mungkin percaturan tersebut boleh diterima kerana rata-rata menurut mereka, 'akar umbi' mahukan Anwar Ibrahim, Nizar Jamaluddin atau Khalid Samad menjadi pemimpin tertinggi, tak kira samada Anwar pincang daripada segi moral and licik dalam mempertaruhkan maruah negara, atau Nizar yang tidak mengenal kedaulatan undang-undang selain jelas menderhaka kepada sistem beraja, sementara Khalid Samad yang terbelenggu oleh prinsip Islam yang seolah-olah sengaja diguna untuk keuntungan peribadi.
Pakatan Rakyat amnya, tidak boleh menerima cadangan Zaid kerana apa yang mereka mahukan supaya Pakatan Rakyat sebagai kumpulan mengambilalih dan 'membersihkan' sistem yang mereka anggap pincang.Apa yang tersirat ialah 'keinginan rakyat' itu sebenarnya keinginan DAP!
Jika Ku Li dipilih, mereka mempersoalkan siapa yang akan membawa pihak-pihak yang korup ke muka pengadilan? Apakah mereka semua akan diampunkan dan seterusnya menyeru seluruh rakyat Malaysia memandang ke hadapan dan lupakan kesalahan yang lalu. Tidak, ini mereka tidak boleh terima sama sekali!
Walau bagaimanapun, percaturan ini hanyalah satu wayang, atau jelas membuktikan sekali lagi betapa Pakatan begitu berpecah...
Di sebalik ini semua, timbul persoalan...1Malaysia Najib semakin menyerlah dan positif, dan Anwar kehabisan modal untuk berjuang di atas premis kebebasan dan demokrasi beracuankan Amerika dan kuncu-kuncunya. Anwar tersepit di antara kebenaran dan kerakusan nafsu serakah, Nizar tenggelam dalam kemabukan perjuangan untuk membalas dendam kerana rezeki dan suratan tidak menyebelahinya (ke mana pergi sifat tawakkal sebagai orang Islam?) dan Khalid Samad hanyut dek ketaksuban menyatukan Islam dan bukan Islam hingga sanggup mengorbankan prinsip asas tanpa berfikir panjang.
Inikah sifat-sifat kepimpinan yang kita mahukan untuk Malaysia?
Wednesday, November 11, 2009
Tuesday, November 10, 2009
“My challenge to YB Siva, I dare you to step down within 24 hours as Vice President and we contest one to one. Let the PKR members decide whether defending and upholding Islam and the Muslim rights is or is not the party policy.
“If I lost then I am more than willing to leave PKR, for a party that do not defend and uphold Islam and the Muslim rights is not the party that I should be associated with,” he said in a statement today.
Zul’s statement is believed to be referring to liberal views expressed by Sivarasa and other leaders within the party who are pushing for a moderate image for the party.
But to the Kulim MP, these leaders often try impose their views as the dominant and guiding ideology of the party at the expense of suppressing the views of others such as himself.
“I want to ask YB Siva and the like of him, what does he mean when he said by toeing the party policy. Whose policy is he talking about? His policy? Is defending the right of Islam and the Muslim against the policy of PKR?
“All that I have defended and fought for are the rights of Islam and the Muslims. Is that a sin in PKR? Does human rights meant only rights of others, and Muslim has no say at all but to take everything hands down...”
-ZULKIFLY NORDIN, MP FOR KULIM
Monday, November 9, 2009
Apa hal dengan kelantangan Anwar tiba-tiba saja menyergah orangnya supaya patuh kepada manifesto dan misi Pakatan, atau jika enggan, keluar saja dari persekongkolan tersebut?
Gesaan yang sama juga boleh ditujukan kepada dirinya sendiri.
Kerana Anwar begitu rela berjuang untuk hak Hindu dan India, apakah dia akan berani mendabik dada mempertahankan kuil Sri Mahariaman yang didakwa berusia 150 tahun di Shah Alam daripada dirobohkan? Apatah lagi berdasarkan dakwaan kononnya orang Islam tidak berhak mengadu tentang kewujudannya?
Orang India mendakwa orang Melayu/Muslim mula menduduki kawasan tersebut setelah begitu lama kuil berkenaan dibina, malahan menurut mereka, setelah lebih 100 tahun! Oleh itu, mereka berkata jika orang Melayu tidak boleh menerima perancangan baru itu, mereka seharusnya keluar daripada kawasan tersebut. Apakah bentuk tindakan Anwar sebagai penaung Hindu dan kaum India untuk mempertahankan kedudukan? Apakah dia akan meminta supaya Khalid Ibrahim mengisytiharkan kawasan berkenaan sebagai tapak 'warisan?, dan seterusnya dilindungi?
Dalam keadaan yanag sama juga , Anwar perlu mengumumkan PKR tidak akan akan menyokong pembinaan patung Mazu kerana dibina terlalu hampir dengan sebuah masjid. Berhadapan dengan isu ini, apakah Anwar akan berani membantah gesaan Mufti negeri dan ABIM supaya pembinaan patung tersebut dihentikan walaupun telah diberi kebenaran?
Sekiranya Anwar tidak mampu menyokong isu-isu ini secara tegas dan terbuka, PKR seharusnya bungkus dan janganlagi menipu orang ramai samada di Sabah, Selangor atau di mana-mana saja....
Thursday, November 5, 2009
"Menteri Besar Selangor, Tan Sri Khalid Ibrahim mengarahkan Jabatan Agama Islam Selangor (JAIS) untuk menghadap Sultan Selangor Sultan Sharafuddin Idris Shah bagi memberi penjelasan mengenai isu penangkapan bekas Mufti Perlis, Dr Mohd Asri Zainul Abidin.
"Ketika ini langkah terbaik ialah dengan menyediakan satu penjelasan yang terperinci kepada Sultan Sharafuddin mengenai isu ini kerana tuanku merupakan ketua agama Islam di Selangor.
"Kami telah memanggil Pengarah JAIS, Datuk Mohammed Khusrin Munawi bagi memberikan taklimat lengkap mengenai sebab-sebab penangkapan itu," katanya selepas mesyuarat minggu exco di sini semalam.
Khalid menambah, hasil perbincangan secara tertutup dengan Pengarah JAIS itu hanya akan dimaklumkan kepada sultan dan tidak akan didedahkan kepada media pada masa ini...."
-Dipetik dari Mstar
Tuesday, November 3, 2009
This is just not real...
With his counsel asking asking and getting yet another postponement, we may well be asking if Anwar, the 'saviour' of bureaucratic efficiency, democracy and pro activeness in the government (judiciary notwithstanding), has clearly endorsed his pretensions about self-righteousness and champion of the correct. He's no more than a vile hypocrite!
What gives? His request (obviously) and the panderings of his learned counsel for voluminous trial delays is making a mockery of our laws...talk about the pot calling the kettle black!
Friday, October 30, 2009
It is all too easy to connect the dotted lines and say Badrul was bought over by BN...
But looking at the jealousies and infighting elsewhere in PKR, one should be cautioned to the fact that the integrity of that party, its leaders and its stalwarts is not beyond reproach. Hence, it is naturally accepted that Badrul and the others of his ilk may have really valid reasons for their fall from grace. You mean to say that once they are in PKR and inducted in the perceived hallowed but sneaky halls of Pakatan, they cant get out? Just reminds me of that runaway 70s hit by Eagles, 'Hotel California,' when the give away last line of the lyrics said, "...You can checkout any time you like, but you can never leave!"
There may be many interpretations to the whole meaning of the song - anything from simply literal to the bizarre , but back to Badrul Hisham, the rep for Port Klang, his political persona is not beholden only to PKR and Pakatan. They say '...there are no permanent friends or enemies in politics...' Well, right, this is just a an example of of the truth of that saying.
Badrul, or whoever can be perceived as jumping the people's (party's) trust, but going by the very spirit of his elevation as people's representative, what gives?
Lets get this straight. He campaigned and the end result was that members of his constituents believed in his cause, hence they gave the mandate to him to represent them. Giving mandate obviously meant that he has the right and authority to decide whats best for his constituency, even to the extend of jumping ship and swimming across to a safer vessel to fight another day for his beloved people.
Who are we to say that he had not thought out whats best for his constituents? Who are we to think that even Anwar (god forbid!) may revert to UMNO in due course?
Wednesday, October 28, 2009
Anwar: Some say he is an enigma. Some say his ways are a paradox, but I'd not hesitate to categorically state that he is a political ogre and a hypocrite.
Lets ask why and how he was readily admitted into UMNO from merely being a maverick and impetuous student leader that he was in the 70s.
Once in UMNO and the Government, his scheming ways soon found the creation of an inner circle of young but greedy Malay entrepreneurs and instant corporate types, being nurtured and manipulated by equally greedy Chinese godfathers who's devious track records are open for inspection across Asia..
These instant millionaires and billionaires pandered to his ambitions and grand design, while the people who had placed trust in him were deceived.
When everything came crashing own when he tripped on his sexual indiscretions, the devious schemer that is Anwar Ibrahim swiftly put to work all the strategies he had put in place and nurtured - strategies that covered anything from outright corruption to the selling of the country's soul to the devil.
Now that Anwar is riding high on the back of the Opposition, he found it easy to deceive all sides with his chameleon-like expertise. He never hesitated to walk the grounds of populism, promising hope when there is none, sowing discontent and breeding hatred.
A facet that many failed to ask or notice is while staunchly accusing the govt of sidelining democratic principles and lashing out at the judiciary with diatribes that run the spectrum of being kangaroo-like, affecting different sets of laws for friends and foes, he, nevertheless still hold on to those very democratic and judicial principles by partaking of the elections and resorting to the same legal system which he condemns.
Hence, we see the hypocrite, the diseased chameleon and the evil that he is...
Pagi tadi bekas Speaker Dewan Undangan negeri Perak ditanggalkan jubahnya oleh pihak berkuasa sebelum dibenarkan memasuki dewan...tak ada pertunjukan bogel le...
Dan seperti dijangka, kecoh lagi dalam dewan...
Tuesday, October 27, 2009
Jangan lepaskan peluang menonton pertunjukan bogel di bawah naungan ADUN Pakatan di Dewan Undangan Negeri Perak esok.
Ini bakal terjadi apabila Sivakumar berkemungkinan besar menghadirkan diri memakai jubah rasmi Speaker walaupun
mahkamah telah memutuskan dia bukan lagi Speaker yang sah.
Berikutan itu, apakah ada kemungkinan besar sergeant-at-arms akan melucutkan pakaian Sivakumar?
Bagaimanapun secara serious, apa kata jika Sivakumar ditangkap dan di dakwa di luar dewan sekiranya dia terus
angkuh dan menyamar sebagai Speaker? Ini peluang untuk sedikit sebanyak membawa ketenaangan dalam kancah politik Perak yang penuh paradoks.
Tindakan yg sama boleh diambil ke atas Nizar jika dia terus menganggap dirinya MB.
Takziah kepada keluarga adik Dina Deve Nathan, 11, dari SK Tamil Mambang Diawan berikutan tragedi jambatan runtuh di Sg Kampar, Perak malam tadi :(
Siasatan segera PERLU dilakukan tanpa birokrasi berpanjangan. Mereka yang cuai perlu bertanggung jawab.
Monday, October 26, 2009
Nik Aziz pernah maki hamun UMNO sebagai celaka selain mendoakan UMNO hancur...
Tapi ulama PAS yang sebelum ini begitu dihormati dan disegani itu mengampunkan Elizabeth Wong bersekedudukan dan berkhalwat dengan lelaki Islam.
Nik Aziz juga tidak menghiraukan Gobala mempermainkan ayat quran dan tindakan biadab Ronnie Liu melafazkan "...your fucking religion..." kepada ustaz Redzuan Tee.
Nah...sekarang dah makan diri.
Saturday, October 24, 2009
Hampir semua parti politik di Malaysia ketika ini dirundung masalah.
Bukan setakat MCA, MIC, UMNO, dan Pakatan saja, malahan si Ibrahim Ali yang bebas tu pun digugat dilema.
Dalam kemelut yang boleh dianggap isu politik nasional ini, kita melihat UMNO satu-satunya parti yang semakin menampakkan potensi 'turnaround' yang pantas dan bertenaga. Hampir semua dalam UMNO pusat termasuk pucuk pimpinan akur dengan imperatif bersatu dan bekerjasama. Hanya satu masalah yang perlu ditangani segera ialah isu perkelompokan di UMNO bahagian dan cawangan. Keadaan masih tidak menampakkan kemajuan ketara walaupun rata-rata seluruh ahli mendengar dan menonton retorik agresif pucuk pimpinan semasa Perhimpunan Agung baru-baru ini.
Seolah-olah apa yang diluahkan pucuk pimpinan sekadar retorik kosong kerana di akar-umbi jika kita sudi meluangkana masa berada di kampung-kampung, kita akan mendapati betapa seluruh ahli masih taksub dengan individu-individu tertentu. Ini menyebabkan mereka yang berada di luar sempadan 'kekeluargaan' ketua bahagian dan cawangan berasa tersisih.
UMNO berpotensi bersatu dan mantap dalam masa terdekat, tetapi hakikatnya apa pulak dengan orang Melayu, amnya? Mereka yang tergolong dalam kategori majoriti sepi semakin jauh terhindar atau meghindarkan diri kerana mual dengan fe 'el pemimpin UMNO bahagian dan cawangan.
Inilah paradoks yang menghantui UMNO...
Sunday, October 18, 2009
Pakatan and pro-opposition bloggers were swift to invoke damage control as regards the latest developments in East Malaysia.
At the the centre of the controversy was Zaid Ibrahim, who was also rapidly moved into the middle of the cross hairs courtesy of the PKR chapters of Sabah and Sarawak...or so it seemed.
As the saga unfolded, detracting fingers immediately came up to point at Azmin Ali. Well, it is surely not by chance that his name was summoned to pit against Zaid Ibrahim. His feelings of insecurity for whatever reasons have always been at the core of many problems when it comes to matters relating to PKR's leadership.
Just look at Selangor. Observe how it was Azmin, whos name was revealed as the source of many a disgruntlement relating to MB Khalid Ibrahim. Using guerrilla political tactics, Azmin has sharpened his 'killing' skills to saturate the ground before making the coup de grace.
The same is happening in Sabah and Sarawak. Zaid's presence and prominence with regards to appearances in both states had again turned up the hairs behind Azmin's rubber neck. Just watch as the scene unfolds...the scheming character that is Azmin Ali only tells of the greed and skulduggery within Anwars PKR.
Friday, October 16, 2009
Kehadiran Zaid Ibrahim dalam PKR seperti duri dalam daging...setidak-tidaknya itulah yang dirasakan oleh ramai pemimpin parti tersebut.
Mereka menganggap Zaid sebagai anak emas Anwar yang diberi segala keistimewaan walaupun baru setahun jagung dalam PKR. Mereka tidak senang dengan desakan peguam kaya itu supaya dibina platform umum bersama parti komponen Pakatan yang lain.
Tetapi, kini strategi itu semakin memakan diri. Ia semakin menaikkan kemarahan akar umbi PKR terhadap kepimpinan Anwar.
Perkembagan terbaru ini ekoran keputusan yang diambil malam Selasa lalu di mana Biro Politik PKR menyekat rancangan untuk menghantar Zaid ke Sabah dan Sarawak hujung minggu ini berikutan apa yang diwayangkan kononnya ada tentangan hebat 17 daripada 23 bahagian parti tersebut di sana.
Kita lihat apa berlaku selanjutnya...
Thursday, October 15, 2009
Khairy calls for the Malays to discard seige mentality?
Is it really siege mentality or an accepted form of modern survival (of the fittest)?
All countries and societies are not devoid of seige mentality. The rationale of having a standing army,ethnic laws, and right wing (or left wing political parties) to protect certain interests (openly or discreet) only show their state of mind.
Perhaps, Khairy as a person has yet to realise the pattern of offensives perpetrated by the non-Malays?
The fact tht we have UMNO, MCA, MIC, Makkal Sakti, and the NGOs focused on protecting certain things is evidence of the presence of siege mentality...western classical utopian ideas much dwelled and glorified at ivy league universities, Oxford and Cambridge are all but just lofty dreams of dreamers...
It is not such a mentality that pulls down or stops some Malays from progressing, it is their lethargy in the all out pursuit of excellence and the pandered mindset.
Siege mentality is even thicker within the Chinese and Indian societies. Just look at the various clans within the sino creed and the caste system among Hindus. More often than not, defensive stance taken by these clans only reflect their aversion to the perceived or real incursions into their turf.
Wednesday, October 14, 2009
Going by UMNO President Dato' Seri Najib Tun Razak and his deputy Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin's speech at the 60th AGM of UMNO at the PWTC in Kuala Lumpur yesterday, the leadership wants UMNO's focus be realigned in the light of the new political environment.
This sentiment was similarly echoed by by UMNO Youth Chief Khairy Jamaluddin in his policy speech at the pemuda Assembly today.
However, the effect of Khairy's call for UMNO Youth to embrace the mantra of Malay leadership instead of Malay supremacy is questionable. He wants Pemuda to stop its radical stand and fall back a step behind that of the party's leadership.
Comments from Pemuda leaders carried rumblings about the youth wing needing to be radical and that they will not follow party leadership blindly.
Perhaps they need time for the idea to sink in, but we would think that given the strident voices of those outside UMNO, Pemuda's radicalism and intransigence are still needed.
Can UMNO's leadership convince the hot blooded young turks? This is about the reverse of trying to evoke awareness among the apolitical youths of Malaysia (all 4 million of them) to participate in the voting process.
Monday, October 12, 2009
Bukan kecik anak majoriti yang diraih oleh Isa Samad di Bagan Pinang.
Apa yang nyata, kemenangan di DUN N31 itu hasil kesepaduan parti komponen, kegigihan pekerja parti dan JUGA jentera komunikasi pro BN, seperti para bloggers melalui Internet dan secara fizikal. Dewasa ini untuk memenangi sesuatu pertandingan politik bukan sekadar bergantung kepada kemampuan gah berpidato oleh elemen-elemen kepimpinan parti, tetapi lebih penting strategi untuk menerang, mempengaruhi dan memenangi minda dan hati pengundi sasaran banyak perlu dilakukan secara konsisten, terutama melalui media siber.
Kini rezeki dan tuah membuka ruang untuk BN/UMNO bernafas seiring cetusan semangat untuk terus berjuang. Tetapi perjuangan bentuk apa? Bentuk lama? Sudah tentu tidak sekali...jendela kepada pelbagai kaedah teknologi kini terbuka, seperti mana pendekatan Dato' Seri Najib berkesan menyentuh suarahati anak-anak muda melalui alam maya. Ia hanya menunggu 'talent', ketajaman fikiran, dan ilmu mendalam untuk bersama melayarkan bahtera BN ke arah kemenangan lebih besar. Semua ini bergantung kepada keikhlasan dan ketelusan kepimpinan dan seluruh ahli.
Kenal pasti resipi di Bagan Pinang selain 'credential' calon, pelajari segala yang tersilap sebagai iktibar dan, insyallah laluan ke arah kejayaan akan luas terbuka...
Sunday, October 11, 2009
Umno veteran, and some say contrarian, Tengku Razaleigh Hamzah has raised eyebrows yet again with a statement that perhaps it would be better for the party to lose at Bagan Pinang.
For the good of the party, the dignity of the Malay community it claims to represent and for the sake of the nationwide reform in governance and politics that we must undergo, it would be better if Umno lost today, and used the loss to begin internal reform,” Razaleigh said in his latest blog posting.
Ku Li is not alone in his anger that the party’s current top leadership chose to select Isa Abdul Samad as its candidate in the Bagan Pinang by-election. Former Umno president Mahathir Mohamad has minced no words on the subject, even offering himself if the party had no other talent.
- Malaysian Mirror
NAJIB KUAT, TETAPI UMNO LEMAH!
Tun Mahathir berkata, “PM Najib memerlukan UMNO yang kuat untuk menentukan kejayaan membangunkan negara dan orang Melayu”, dengan mengesa agar UMNO di peringkat Bahagian diperkukuhkan dan menerima keyakinan rakyat. “UMNO perlu menolak pemimpin yang mementingkan diri sendiri, terutama yang sanggup melakukan politik wang (amalan rasuah) untuk mengekalkan kedudukan masing masing”.
“Hari ini UMNO lemah! Kita kalah dari prestasi paling baik (PRU XI 21 Mac 2004) hingga paling buruk (PRU XII 8 Mac 2008) bukan sebab Pembangkang kuat”, sambil mengesa agar UMNO secara komprehensif, termasuk diperingkat bahagian melakukan proses untuk mengukuhkan kepimpinan dan jentera parti. Beliau percaya sekiranya UMNO diperkukuhkan, sokongan kepada parti komponen BN juga akan meningkat.
Bercakap semasa program 'Suntikan Semangat Satria II' anjuran UMNO Petaling Utama kelmarin, beliau juga menegaskan PM Najib bukanlah seorang pemimpin yang lemah. Namun lima tahun dibawah Kepimpinan PM Dato’ Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi menyaksikan gejala politik wang menular dan pemimpin hanya mementingkan diri sendiri. PM Abdullah membiarkan diri dipengaruhi oleh orang tertentu, termasuk keluarga terdekat untuk membuat keputusan. Ini termasuk Kepimpinan yang enggan mendengar aspirasi sebenar rakyat tetapi lebih rela mendengar semua dalam keadaan baik belaka, walaupun ianya analisa palsu. “Akhirnya, akar umbi dan rakyat bertindak untuk ‘menghantar mesej’ semasa Pilihanraya Umum (PRU XII 8 Mac 2008)”.
Kelemahan kepimpinan PM Abdullah ini ditafsirkan sebagai ‘keterbukaan’ dan golongan minoriti mengambil kesempatan sepenuhnya peluang yang tidak pernah wujud ini, dan sekali gus tidak lagi menghormati dan prihatin sensitiviti majoriti dalam permintaan mereka. Oleh kerana PM Abdullah membiarkan UMNO dan BN lemah, maka PM Dato’ Seri Najib mewarisi kepimpinan yang lemah. Beliau terpaksa berkompromi dengan Bukan Melayu walaupun banyak dari ‘pemberian’ ini sebenarnya tidak akan menambahkan sokongan kepada Kerajaan dan/atau BN.
Dalam sessi soal jawab, apabila isu dibangkitkan DAP kini membuka cawangan Melayu, beliau menjelaskan ini berlaku kerana Kepimpinan UMNO lemah dan tidak lagi membawa aspirasi yang rakyat mahukan termasuk orang Melayu, terutama isu keterbukaan dan kepimpinan yang bersih dan mengamalkan hidup keserdehanaan.
Amanat ini penting kerana UMNO Bahagian Petaling Jaya Selatan merupakan bahagian UMNO yang dibelenggu masalah kepimpinan dan dalaman. Ketua Bahagianya Kpt (B) Dato’ Zahar Hashim bertindak keluar dari parti dan menyertai PAS. Difahamkan ianya juga melibatkan kontrak yang melibatkan Eurocopter. Akibatnya satu pertiga AJK Bahagian mengikut beliau dan jentera pentadbiran UMNO bahagian hampir lumpuh, termasuk pejabat bahagian berubah menjadi Markas PAS serta merta dengan tindakan Zahar ini. Semasa keluar parti, Zahar dijangkan akan dikenakan tindakan oleh Lembaga Disiplin UMNO...
Dipetik dari BigDog
Thursday, October 8, 2009
Apakah itu Barisan Pembangkang atau Pakatan Rakyat? Walaupun ia tidak lain daripada impian yang jauh terbabas daripada realiti, namun ramai yang tertipu dan terus mempercayainya. Apakah kita hairan atau terkejut apabila berlaku pergeseran di antara PAS dan DAP di Selangor, Pulau Pinang dan Perak? Saya minta para pemimpin PAS fikirkan semula ...apa yang mereka dapat sejak sekian lama bersekongkol dalam igauan ini? Para penyokong kamu tidak letih-letih bergelut dan menyediakan tenaga kerja di setiap pilihanraya kecil, namun selepas itu apa keuntungan yang kamu dapat? Apakah ganjaran yang diberi kepada mereka yang menyokong PAS?
Sejak pilihanraya umum pada 2008, apakah kita menyedari majoriti mereka yang berpaling tadah adalah daripada kalangan parti-parti pembangkang? Ini berlaku di Kedah, Selangor dan di Perak. Ini menunjukkan apa? Pertama, ia jelas membuktikan calon-calon yang mereka pilih tidak dilakukan dengan teliti. Bertolak daripada hakikat ini ada pula angan-angan Anwar Ibrahim pada satu ketika dulu untuk menubuhkan Kerajaan Persekutuan dengan apa yang dilaungkan sebagai tindakan berpaling tadah sebahagian besar orang BN...ia tidak lain daripada pembohongan besar. Masihkah kita ingat dia menjanjikan sebuah kerajaan baru pada September 2008? Habuk pun tak dak, malahan sebaliknya yang berlaku sejak daripada tarikh itu. Saya berani bagi jaminan mereka tahu lebih ramai daripada orang di sebelah sana hanya menunggu untuk cabut lari. Apa yang berlaku dengan sendiri membuktikan keadaan.
Para pemimpin pembangkang terlalu banyak melaungkan janji-janji kosong untuk mewujudkan senario yang kononnya lebih demokratik...tetapi apakah kita tidak dapat melihat apa yang sebenarnya berlaku? Di Selangor, Hassan Ali kini berhadapan dengan ancaman akan dilucutkan jawatan exconya. Ini hanya satu contoh. Di manakah demokrasi yang mereka war-warkan?
Kita jangan lupakan bos mereka yang kini menghadapi perbicaraan di mahkamah bersabit jenayah di luar tabii...dia menggunakan apa saja, termasuk melobi kuncu dan dalang-dalang di barat untuk menunda perbicaraan. Kenapa? Apa yang ditakut sangat tu? Oleh yang demikian, apakah kita mesti menerima seorang pemimpin yang takut untuk menghadapi kenyataan di mahkamah? Apa jenisnya pemimpin seperti ini? ...pemimpin yang sanggup melabelkan apa saja sebagai tidak baik dan jahat apabila mendapati dirinya terancam? Dia melabelkan semua pilihanraya demokratik di negara ini sebagai penipuan...bagaimana agaknya dia boleh menang pilihanraya pada 1982? Apakah dia juga turut menipu dalam pemilihan UMNO, lantaran dia dijulangkan begitu tinggi hingga mencetuskan krisis besar dalam parti dan seterusnya menyebabkan tertubuhnya parti Semangat 46.
Mungkin ramai yang dah lupa semua ini, tetapi saya tidak.
Orang lidah bercabang tidak harus diterima. Mereka merasakan diri sebagai pemimpin, tetapi pemimpin jenis apakah mereka hingga sanggup menaburkan pelbagai janji yang mereka tahu tidak mungkin akan ditepati. Apakah kita perlu mempercayai Nizar jika dia berkata PAS tidak mempunyai rancangan untuk menubuhkan sebuah negara islam? Tetapi baru-baru ini kita terbaca pula bagaimana Nik Azmi tanpa segan-silu berkata semua yang tidak mengundi PAS tidak akan masuk Syurga. Apa kata kita tanya Tok Guru samada kawan-kawan mereka dalam DAP juga tidak dapat diterima untuk masuk Syurga? Macam mana dia boleh tau? Dan kita juga pernah membaca tentang cadangan Karpal Singh supaya Anwar bertaubat...tapi apakah Anwar dah bertaubat? Jika jawapannya tidak, apakah yang akan dilakukan oleh Karpal? Dalam keadaan pincang sebegini, kenapa Karpal masih tidur sekatil dengan mereka yang tak sehaluan dengannnya? Saya berani kata mereka semua hanya berlakon dan hidup berpura-pura. Oleh yang demikian, secara realistiknya, mengapa harus seseorang yang berfikiran waras mengundi untuk orang sebegini? Janganlah biarkan mereka memalukan minda anda...anda lebih pintar daripada itu.
Jika calon PAS menang kerusi di Bagan Pinang, bagi tau saya bagaimana agaknya ia akan menguatkan PAS? Apakah dengan kemenangan satu kerusi ini PAS akan diberikan satu kerusi exco di Dewan Undangan Negeri? Apakah anjakan yang bakal berlaku? Apakah kita inginkan seseorang yang lebih berkesan sebagai wakil rakyat dalam kerajaan negeri, atau apakah kita akan memilih calon yang bersekutu dalam barisan pembangkang yang mandul di peringkat negeri?
Baca rasional memilih Isa Samad sebagai pemimpin unggul di sini...
There is no such thing as an Opposition Front or Pakatan Rakyat...yet the people are cheated into thinking there is such a thing. Is it any wonder there is friction between PAS & DAP in Selangor, Penang and Perak? Let me ask the leaders of PAS to ask themselves...what have you gained so far? Your supporters deliver the works at every by election, yet after that what have you gained? And what benefits are there for those who support PAS?
Since the last General Elections in 2008, do we realise that the majority of defections have been from the Opposition parties ? This has happened in Kedah, Selangor and of course, in Perak. What does this show? For one thing, even their candidates have not been properly scrutinised. And to think that Anwar Ibrahim had at one time threatened to form a new Federal government with defections from BN....it is is obvious he was simply calling a bluff. Remember he had promised a new government in September 2008? What happened? Nothing materialised, and instead the opposite has happened since then. I can assure they are fully aware there are many others on their side just waiting to leave the so-called pact of hate.
The Opposition leaders have given a lot of lip service to the idea of a more democratic scenario ...but can we not see the stark reality? Dr. Hassan Ali of Selangor is now faced with a real possibility of being expelled from the Exco. And that is just one example. Where is this democracy they talk about?
Let's not forget their boss is now facing a court trial for an unnatural crime....he is trying everything,including lobbying his masters in the West, to try to postpone the court hearing. Why? What is he scared of? So, should we accept a leader who cant even face trial in court? What kind of leader is this who will label anything and everything as bad when he is under threat? He labels all democratic elections in our country as rigged....how did he win his first elections in 1982? Perhaps he rigged it, too. Perhaps he also rigged the UMNO party elections and subsequently rose so quickly that it caused a major internal crisis in UMNO - a crisis that gave rise to Semangat 46.
Have we forgotten all these?
People who speak with forked tongues should not be accepted. They think they are leaders but what kind of leaders are these when they make promises they do not intend to keep? Should we believe Nizar if he says PAS has no intentions of forming an Islamic state? He even claimed it was not in the party's (PAS's) constitution. Yet on the other, we recently read about PAS's spiritual advisor Nik Aziz unashamedly announcing that all those who did not vote for PAS would not go to Heaven. Can we ask him then if he thinks his friends in DAP cannot go to Heaven, too? How does he know? And we have also read about Karpal's suggestion that Anwar should repent....but has Anwar repented? If the answer is not yet, what is Karpal going to do about it? Why does Karpal still remain within this so-called union of the most unikely bed-fellows? Sheesh, they are great actors and pretenders. So, realistically, why should anyone with the right frame of mind vote such people into power? Do not let such people insult your intelligence.
If the PAS candidate wins this Bagan Pinang seat, tell me frankly how will it strengthen PAS? Can this one win make PAS sit in the Exco? Can it be effective in the State Legislative Assembly? What difference will it make? Do you want to elect someone who can be an effective representative of the people in the state government or will you choose a candidate to make him sit in an impotent opposition at the state level?
Why Isa Samad? Read here...